Monthly Archive for August, 2008

Page 3 of 6

The Gospel is at the Heart of Peacemaking (And forgiveness/reconciliation!)

In Unpacking Forgiveness my central goal is to show how the Cross (and how God forgives us) is foundational to understanding interpersonal forgiveness (forgiving one another).

Today on Route 5:9 (Peacemakers’ blog), Fred Barthel emphasizes this point in a succinct way:

To to me, a person who truly “gets” biblical peacemaking is one who understands the intimate connection between what God has done for us in Christ and how we treat one another.

Reconciliation is at the heart of the gospel, and so the gospel is at the heart of our ministry. Even when we were still his enemies, God made peace with us through the death and resurrection of his Son. And since we have been reconciled with God, we can be reconciled with one another. Because God has forgiven us in Christ, we can forgive others. This is a radically different way for Christians to relate to each other—a way that glorifies his Son and powerfully appeals to a watching world. Peacemaker Ministries exists to help the church live out this wonderful truth.

Read the whole thing here.

Notice the emphasis on forgiveness and reconciliation.  Professing Christians often separate reconciliation and forgiveness.  While it is useful to study these two components, as though looking at different facets of a diamond, reconciliation and forgiveness should not be put asunder!  The Bible never speaks of God forgiving someone without Him also being reconciled to them . . . this has myriad implications for interpersonal forgiveness, and it raises a host of questions . . . some of which I address in Unpacking Forgiveness.

For now, at least take the Forgiveness Quiz.  Remember, you will be eligible for a free book.  (Click here for the Forgiveness Quiz).

I highly recommend Ken Sande’s book, The Peacemaker.

Stretch Your Mind Regarding the Problem of Evil

Concisely stated, the problem of evil is the question of how it can be simultaneously true that (1) God is all-powerful, (2) God is good, (3) Evil exists.

Here John Frame responds to preliminary questions in an interview with Andy Naselli.

Cancer’s Unexpected Blessings

  • If you would, pray for my friend Kurt. 
  • Maybe send a link to Tony Snow’s article, “Cancer’s Unexpected Blessings”, to someone you know who is facing cancer.
  • And, may we remind as many as possible of the necessity of believing in Christ:
  • ” “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. . . Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him (John 3:16-17, 36).”

————————————–

I found out yesterday that my friend Kurt has an aggressive form of cancer.  I’ve known Kurt for quite a long time now.  I was there when he trusted Christ as his personal Savior, I prayed for him when he lost his job.  From a distance, I have seen how the seed of the Gospel has fallen on good soil in his life.

So, I got in touch. I may have benefited more from the phone call to Kurt than he did. In a short conversation, Kurt said many things that ring in my mind.  He stressed how clearly he and his wife see the hand of God at work as they face the “Valley of the shadow of death.”  He expressed thanks that he has been accepted into a special treatment program.  He talked about he and his wife’s commitment to E.L.I.M. Retreats (it sounds really wonderful, see here). 

Kurt also mentioned how many times he has read the late Tony Snow’s Article: “Cancer’s Unexpected Blessings.”  It sounded like Kurt could almost quote the article from memory.  I was previously aware of the article, but hadn’t read it that closely.  I made sure to ready it today.  Courageously, Snow wrote:

I don’t know why I have cancer, and I don’t much care. It is what it is—a plain and indisputable fact. Yet even while staring into a mirror darkly, great and stunning truths begin to take shape. Our maladies define a central feature of our existence: We are fallen. We are imperfect. Our bodies give out.

But despite this—because of it—God offers the possibility of salvation and grace. We don’t know how the narrative of our lives will end, but we get to choose how to use the interval between now and the moment we meet our Creator face-to-face. . .

The moment you enter the Valley of the Shadow of Death, things change. You discover that Christianity is not something doughy, passive, pious, and soft. Faith may be the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. But it also draws you into a world shorn of fearful caution. The life of belief teems with thrills, boldness, danger, shocks, reversals, triumphs, and epiphanies. Think of Paul, traipsing though the known world and contemplating trips to what must have seemed the antipodes (Spain), shaking the dust from his sandals, worrying not about the morrow, but only about the moment.

There’s nothing wilder than a life of humble virtue—for it is through selflessness and service that God wrings from our bodies and spirits the most we ever could give, the most we ever could offer, and the most we ever could do. . .

Read the whole thing here.

I deeply appreciate the spirit of Snow’s article.  I pray that I will be as courageous when it is my turn to walk through the “valley of the shadow of death.”  But, I do wish he had concluded his article with a particular focus on the Lord Jesus Christ.  Snow wrote that God holds each and every one of us in the hollow of his hand.  Better to be clearer about the necessity of trusting Christ: “Yet to all who received him, to those who believe in his name, he gave the right to become children of God (John 1:12).” 

Rick Warren On Obama’s, "Above My Pay Grade," Comment

Read this post on Rick Warren’s assessment of Senator Obama’s response to, “When does life begin?”

I still haven’t seen the interview.  It’s been a busy week.  But, I hear it is worth watching.

Why is my blog title: "A Brick in the Valley?"

While it is true that our church is made out of bricks, the title for my blog points to the New Testament metaphor that Christians are “living stones.”

And, despite how many Christians live, God makes bricks with a building in mind.  God never made a brick expecting it to be out laying in the weeds by itself.

Maybe the best way to make the point is to describe a conversation I had with four bricks I found out behind the tool shed at our previous home. . .

———

Four bricks hide behind my tool shed. The shed sits on the edge of the woods so leaves hide the bricks. If you weren’t looking, you wouldn’t notice them: just a few bricks settling into moist, black soil under brown oak leaves.

If I picked up one of those bricks, brushed the leaves off it, and asked it what it is doing, I wonder what it would say. I know that bricks can’t talk. Bear with me for the sake of the thing. A brick disconnected from any building, lying behind my tool shed, how would it explain itself?

It might be a little defensive. Can’t you just hear the brick bristling when asked why it is not in a building?

“Look, I am a brick! I assure you that I am a brick. Are you implying that I am not a brick?”

I would probe gently. “No, I’m just wondering why you aren’t part of one sort of building or another? Just curious.”

The defense would continue. “Look, I don’t have to be in a building in order to be a brick. I can be a brick all on my own.”

True enough.

Then again, maybe it wouldn’t be a defensive brick. It might be a “friendly, procrastinating” brick: agreeable and well-intentioned.

It would say, “I know what you are thinking and you are right. I do need to find a good building. I just haven’t gotten around to it. I mean there was a time when I was in a building, a school actually, but I drifted away and now I’m back here behind the tool shed. But, I am going to find a good building. I still listen to the radio – - -you know, to stay in touch with what is going on in the building industry.”

Or, it might be critical: a brick that lists and describes the imperfections in other bricks. This brick would point its finger while it answered. It would go on offense.

“Hey, I got tired of being next to so many irregular bricks. Bricks, and I am talking especially about the ones in buildings – - they have rough edges. I don’t want to judge, you understand, but they’re lopsided. They’re uneven. I decided if that’s what the other bricks are like, then I am not interested in being in a building.”

Or maybe the brick would be too busy. It has nothing against buildings per se. At some point it would even like to be part of one; it just can’t find time.

At the end of the day, there would be as many different excuses as there are loose bricks in the world. Each brick would offer some logic about why it is stacked out behind a tool shed and not mortared into a building.

Of course, none of the explanations would work. There is no good reason for a brick to be lying in a sloppy pile, dirt crusted on the side of it, underneath brittle leaves.

Don’t get me wrong. The explanations make sense. I can relate. I understand that a brick is still a brick regardless of whether or not it is in a building. We’ve all seen enough brick-laying going on to know that it is an involved process; there are legitimate reasons why a brick might take some time jumping into the wheel barrow. And, there are a lot of uneven bricks in the world – - certainly, it is a challenge to fit next to them day after day.

What brick isn’t busy?

But, none of those reasons adequately explain why a brick would be tossed aside next to a tool shed under decaying leaves and hollow excuses.

Bricks are made with a building in mind. A brick, and I looked this up, is “an artificial stone made by forming clay into a rectangular block.” After it has been formed, it is hardened, either by burning in a kiln or sun-drying. And, the whole process is done for the purpose of building.

No brick was ever kiln fired with a goal of seeing it exist unto itself. Brick-makers dream about a school or a store, a high-rise or a home. Bricks are meant to build something grand.

* * *

If you didn’t know the point of the word picture, the Bible might insult you by calling you a “brick.” Think about it. If someone looked you dead in the eye and said, “Hey, ‘rock,’” you might take offense.

But, if you are a Christian, then you are a brick: a “living” brick, but a brick never the less. Peter wrote:

“. . .you also, like living ‘bricks,’ are being built into a spiritual ‘building’ . . (1 Peter 2:9a).”

Peter means no offense. He’s explaining that God makes “bricks” with a building in mind. The Creator never envisioned building blocks in isolation from one another. He pictured community.

“Living stones” is a more accurate translation than “living bricks.” Bricks are the same. Stones come in all shapes and sizes. The kind of building that God intends has widely varied stones laid together. Picture the stones in cottage chimneys in stories like Hansel and Gretel: oblong stones of all sizes, shapes, and colors, smoothly nestled together.

* * *

I pointed out reasons that bricks give for not being in the building. But, what really deserves attention is the positive side of the thing. What should motivate a brick to be in a building? Why give time, energy, and space to be part of community? Why be laid together and over and under and next to one another’s lives?

The answer begins and ends with the foundation of the building, what Peter calls a chosen and precious cornerstone: the Lord Jesus Christ. He is such a stunningly perfect foundation for any building, so brilliant that anyone who glimpses Him would long to be mortared into a building with Him.

But, along with Jesus, part of the motivation to be a part of community must be to see the sheer beauty of human lives in all their diversity coming together. If we took the time to look at lives the way that we soak in sunsets, we might find ourselves out behind the tool shed far less often.

People in community are a beautiful sight to behold. Being in the building, in community, doesn’t mean that we lose our individual identity. In a way, when a brick is incorporated into the structure, it gets more attention because it is visible. Reflect on that. Long grass and leaves swallow a brick in isolation. Loose bricks are soon lost and forgotten. But a brick mortared into relationship with other bricks is seen, like the red bricks in the church building where I pastor, unlike the bricks behind my tool shed. When a stone is in the building, that’s when you might stop and look at that one unique place in the building and how it is a part of the whole, a tile in the mosaic, a pane in a stain glassed window.

First Day of School 2008

First day of school today.  The person willing to exegete the photograph will learn much about our family.

(1)  Pretty in Pink: Allison opposes pink and all its implications on principle.  Pretty much everything Mary Beth wore is pink, from her shoes to her backpack.First Day of School 2008

(2) We support nuclear energy: If you look over Chris’ shoulder you can see the looming nuclear towers in the background.  Here in Northern Illinois, we were nuclear when nuclear wasn’t cool.

(3) It’s football season: There’s a story (perhaps apocryphal) about the Notre Dame team being at the cemetery to visit George Gipp’s grave.  On the way out of the cemetary, a few players stopped at the grave of the recently deceased basketball coach’s grave in order to pay their respects.  Knute Rockne didn’t approve.  He beckoned the players to come at once and said sternly, “It’s football season boys.”  All of which is to point out that it’s football season here.  Chris is wearing his A.J. Hawk jersey while Ben’s shirt reads, “Don’t take it personally.”  On the back it says, “Smashing you into the turf is just part of the job.”

Though we lost both football games this weekend.

(4) We live in a sparsely populated area.  You will notice that the population density is not real high here in Ogle County.

(5) I have put off sealing our deck.  While this may not be obvious to the untrained eye, I need to seal the deck.

Who in Hell . . .?

To forgive in the right way, you must believe rightly about hell.

If I was asked to layout the areas of systematic theology/doctrine which most immediately come to bear on unpacking forgiveness I would begin with these.

  • Doctrine of Salvation (soteriology): We are to forgive others as God forgives us.  This means we must begin with the Cross and understand with clarity how God forgives, if we are to know how to forgive others.
  • Providence refers to the word theologians use to describe the truth that God is directly involved in history and is working all things together to accomplish His purposes.  Firmly owning providence will allow us to say with Joseph that though someone may have intended to harm me, God is using it for good.
  • Doctrine of Last Things (or the future work of Christ, Eschatology) with an emphasis on hell.  Believing what the Bible says about hell is foundational to the area of forgiveness for at least two reasons. 

First, the Bible often encourages believers to take comfort in the fact that God will deal justly with evil people.

“The assurance of God’s ultimate justice (then) frees radical love (now).”  John N. Day

“. . . it is only when God’s wrath and vengeance are hanging as grim realities over the heads of one’s enemies that something of what it means to love and forgive them can touch our hearts.”  Dietrich Bonhoeffer in a letter from prison to Eberhard Bethge.

Second, the Bible motivates offended people to forgive by teaching that a Christian who is unwilling to forgive someone who has offended him or her, should fear for his or her soul.  Saying, “I will never, ever forgive that person is much like saying, “I’m planning on going to hell.”  (Matthew 6:14-15, Matthew 18:35).

It is in this latter area that Western Christians are most deficient.  Believers in our culture may summarize the doctrine of salvation and the centrality of the Cross on some level (though they don’t apply this to forgiveness nearly enough).

People will often say, however glibly, that God works all things together for good.

But, as Al Mohler explains here, many Christians increasingly question an orthodox understanding of hell (that unbelivers will suffer eternally).  

The less people are willing to accept what the Bible teaches about hell, the more vulnerable they are to bitterness.

Reach Out to Those Who Unplug from Church

You can probably think of someone who has stepped away from involvement in a local church. There are many reasons people decide to pull away.

They find a sport or some other form of entertainment that takes the place of church,

they keep putting off finding a new church home,

they are disillusioned with churches because of a past conflict,

or they feel guilty about choices they have made.

Maybe someone you know is angry with God about circumstances he or she has faced and as a result has wandered away from the faith.

Whatever the reason, we know that this quitting cannot be an option. God sometimes calls people to switch churches, but Hebrews 10:25 explicitly commands believers to be a vital part of a local church.

And, James 5:19-20 tells us:

My brothers, if one of you should wander from the truth and someone should bring him back, remember this: Whoever turns a sinner from the error of his way will save him from death and cover over a multitude of sins (James 5:19-20).”

These are the last verses in James and their meaning is amazing. The fact is says James, that God uses people to turn other people back to Himself. And, if God uses you in that way, then you are being used to save such a person from judgment of God and a lifetime of hurt. Are you willing to be used to turn someone back to Christ?

The Personal God

“‘Person’ is the word in our vocabulary that applies to beings who speak, act intentionally, and so on. . . Only in biblical religions is there an absolute principle that is personal. Other religions have personal gods, but those gods are not absolute. Other religions and philosophies (Hinduism, Aristotle, Spinoza, Hegel) have absolute principles, but those principles are impersonal. Islam believes in an unknowable God who can (inconsistently) be described in personal terms; the extent to which Allah is personal is due to Mohammed’s original respect for “the book” (the Jewish/Christian Scriptures) and to the Arab polytheism described in Hadith. Other sects also hold to some level of personality in God, because of the influence of the Bible upon their founders. But groups like the Mormons and the Jehovah’s Witnesses, like the Muslims, are inconsistent in their confession of God’s absolute personality.” John Frame.[1]


[1] John M. Frame, The Doctrine of God (Phillipsburg, PA: P&R Publishing, 2002), 26-27.

The Right U.S. Approach to Georgia

John Mark Reynolds outlines how the United States should relate to unfolding events in Georgia. Read it here.