At a minimum – - be aware that there is a major discussion taking place today in the church about the doctrine of justification. The parties include those who defend a traditional reformed understanding of the doctrine of salvation and others who espouse what is often called the New Perspective on Paul.
One of the decisions I have made with my blog over time is to target the people in my church. I avoid getting into doctrinal discussions that are unnecessarily esoteric or difficult to follow. Of course, I am not a pastor who believes we should preach “down” to our people. And, I do believe that people in our churches need to be aware of significant doctrinal developments.
So, for those willing to stretch their thinking, go over to Mike Wittmer’s blog and read his post on N.T. Wright’s latest book (Click here).
Again, be aware that there is a major discussion underway in the Evangelical church about the doctrine of justification. Since the Reformation, the Protestant definition of “justification” has been a legal declaration by God that those who believe are righteous. But, N.T. Wright and others are calling into question the Reformer’s understanding of the doctrine of justification. Which leads Wittmer to ask, “If someone adopts a different doctrinal understanding . . . should they still consider themselves Protestant?”
This is arguably the most important doctrinal discussion taking place right now in the English speaking world. (Agreed?)
I would acknowledge that I have not studied this enough to write with real clarity about it. I welcome comments from those who will help others understand more clearly the nature of the debate.

