Monthly Archive for June, 2009

Page 3 of 4

How to Battle Pride: Be The Kind of Soil Where It Does Not Grow

Michael Ramsey quoted by John Stott:

Thank God, often and always . . . Thank God carefully and wonderingly, for your continuing privileges . . .Thankfulness is a soil in which pride does not easily grow

In, The Living Church: Convictions of a Lifelong Pastor, by John Stott.

Owen Strachan on Russell Moore’s Adopted for Life

It would be a mistake to consider reading Adopted for Life only if you think you might adopt.  Everyone will profit from this warm theological reflection.  Additional copies arrived in the mail today  I just handed one out in my yard and I plan on giving one away tomorrow.

Owen Strachan:

Theology is alive.  It should be felt, not merely taught.  It should reach into all areas of our lives, bringing light and health to them.  The heft of God’s teaching transforms both the way we think and the way we live.

Theologians who embody this kind of approach are rare (though increasing in number, I think).  One who stands out is Russ Moore of Southern Seminary of Louisville, KY.  A systematician, Moore has a capacious mind, a gift for wit and drama, and an imagination that grasps the significance of biblical truth.  He is a pastor-theologian, simultaneously the Dean of the world’s largest seminary and a Teaching Pastor at Highview Baptist Church in Louisville.  He is a proud and loving father of four. . .

The text itself is full of passion, biblical theology, and humor.  It is not a straight theology of adoption, a personal reflection on adoption, or a handbook on the rudiments of the adoption process.  It is a mixture of all three.

Click here to read the whole thing.

Favorite Bloggers Respond: What Bible Characters Would You Like to Go Out for Dinner With? And, Where Would We Eat in Your Area?

Okay – let me defend a weird question with three points:

  • First, I am pointing you to my favorite blogs.  If you do nothing else, just click through to the bloggers below.  You can subscribe with a feed reader.
  • Second, this is your chance to learn great places to eat from Grand Ledge to Grand Cayman.
  • Third, and most important.  I think there is profit in having your mind sweep across the chapters of Scripture and consider who you would like to ask to have dinner with.  You will benefit from reading these answers.  They’re concise and humorous, but I think serious too.  Take Thabite’s answer which begins the list – - can you imagine going out to eat with Mary and Joseph?   What would you ask them?

Who would you choose?  What restaurant?

**********************

Thabite Anyabwile of Pure Church.  A pastor who thinks theologically about vitally important issues like race and leadership.  It is worth going by his blog just to read the one paragraph summary he has in, “about me.”

We would go to Cayman’s Lighthouse Restaurant, with its wonderful view of the ocean and crashing waves.  Plus, it’s my wife’s favorite restaurant for desserts.  I’d invite Nabal and Abigail.  My wife would love the time with Abigail, learning how to care for a foolish man.  And perhaps we could have some influence on Nabal before it was too late.  Since we can’t invite Jesus, I’d have to go with Mary and Joseph.  They’d have the most fascinating stories!

Darryl Dash of www.DashHouse.com : Darryl is a pastor and shepherd.  He thinks like a pastor.  But, he is also a theologian.  I’ve ordered books because of him.  I chose to have my site hosted by Fused Network per his recommendation.  You will profit from his blog.

Canoe in downtown Toronto. The food and the view are amazing! http://www.oliverbonacini.com/canoemovie.html

Let me pick one from the Old Testament and one from the New. David would be a fascinating dinner guest and may be good for a song or two. The Apostle Paul may be able to answer many of my questions and sort out this New Perspective thing. I would like to see what John the Baptist chooses to order from the menu, though.

Kevin DeYoung of DeYoung, Restless, and Reformed – Again, (you’ll see a pattern) here, Kevin is a pastor who thinks well theologically.  Along with this, he is willing to stand for the truth.  See, for instance, today’s post on 2112 Antietam’s.  Start with the book he wrote with Ted Kluck, Why We’re Not Emergent by Two Guys Who Ought to Be, or Just Do Something.  Either would be great summer reading.  Just Do Something would be a nice gift for recent graduates.

First off, we are going to DeLuca’s on Willow Hwy (Blog Editor’s Note: Jamie and I have inhaled DeLuca’s delicious pizza many times).  The pizza is great and the ambience is, well, dark.  Plus the scrap metal yard next door makes for interesting small talk.  My wife doesn’t like DeLuca’s as much as I do, but we’ve been to Cracker Barrel three times in the past three = months, so it’s my turn.

I’d invite Noah and his wife.  I bet they’d have some stories to tell.  What was it like building the boat all those years?  How did it work with all those animals?  I wonder what he would think about all our cute = Noah’s Ark story books.  Then I’d invite Barnabas.  He sounds like a fun = guy, and as we all know, a good encourager.  I sort of picture him like C.J. Mahaney, minus the athletic prowess.  And I’d love to get Barnabas’ side of the little rift with Paul.

Lig Duncan – First Pres in Jackson – Though I don’t  know Lig well, he took the time to read my book, Unpacking Forgiveness, and graciously wrote an endorsement.  I’ve been able to listen to him preach, and read his thoughts, and I believe that he truly is “Together for the Gospel”: “Together” in the sense that he has a true heart for the Body of Christ, and together in that he has it “together.”

1. Pan-Asia, the best Asian Fusion cuisine in the southern U.S. Grant Nooe, the owner, is a culinary genius. Puts national chains to shame.

2. Paul and Moses will be joining us. And forget casual conversation. They don’t do casual conversation. But in 45 minutes, we will bring theological unity to the entire reformed and evangelical world.

Andrew Ford of Triangular Christianity.  Where I haven’t spent a bunch of time personally with Lig, I just sweated profusely in Africa with Andrew Ford.  We almost died in a back alley mud puddle in Lome.  As the blog name implies, there are three sides to this blog.  Andrew is a pastor who loves missions in general and Togo in particular.

This took longer than 5 minutes.  (Blogging Editor’s Note: Unnecessary complaining)

I’d like us to go out to Cuginos (of downtown Grand Ledge) because they have the best Calzones in the Lansing area.

I would enjoy having dinner with Job because it seems as though he would have so much to say about life and perseverance and God.  I think we would talk about God’s work and grace in his life.

I would also like to invite Priscilla and Aquilla.  They just seem like a nice couple who have their priorities straight and love to invest in the Kingdom.  A bonus is that they lived in Italy for a while and they would enjoy a good Calzone.  I might even bring my Rick Steves book on travel in Italy and a few pictures of the Cinque Terra.

If I were to invite others it would be Lazarus and his sisters, or any one who interacted with Jesus after the resurrection.

Gunny Hartmann of Semper Reformanda knows how to tie a bow tie and posts a wonderful combination of miscellaneous links and pastoral insights.  Has a wacky sense of humor and is understandably an A&M fan given that he lives where the stars at night are big and bright.  But he also has an inexplicable allegiance to the (Philistine) Lakers.

It is good bull, sir. (Blogging Editor’s Note: When Gunny says something is “good bull” this is to be taken as a compliment.  You will need to know this if you read his blog).

I would take you to El Paso, Plano’s Tex-Mex restaurant. I’m friends with the owner and my preferred waiter would take care of us well. Among other things, the fajitas are very nice, but the chips & salsa are my favorite in the Dallas area.

With us would be Enoch, who walked with God (Gen 5:22-24). I’d like to hear about his daily quiet times of personal devotion to pick up some tips. Also at the table would be Moses, he who saw God’s glory (Ex
33:18-23) and he had God stick up for him as a friend (Num 12). I’d like some lessons on humility in light of his awesomeness.

Patricia Hunter of Pollywog Creek – The best endorsement of all: my wife likes her.  Best pictures on the Internet and quite possibly the sweetest blogger in Bloggerdom.  Most famous (in my world) for her painted bunting pictures.

There are no restaurants within an hour of our rural town that either qualify as a favorite or are worthy of such esteemed company, but my husband and I would be thrilled if y’all want to meet at the Columbia Restaurant in Ybor City or St. Augustine for an evening of the finest Spanish-Cuban cuisine. If that doesn’t work, then let’s go casual: Sonny’s Barbecue in Ft. Myers, and coffee and pie at Flora and Ella’s on our way back to Pollywog Creek, where we can continue to engage our guests in conversation for hours around a cozy fire on a cool starlit night.

Miriam can bring her brother Moses (and her tambourine) if she desires, but the woman was a participant in some serious drama, and I can’t wait to hear her perspective on everything from hiding baby Moses in the bulrushes to the parting of the Red Sea and the desert wanderings. Let’s invite Peter and his wife, too. He and my husband would get along great.

Brian McLaughlin of Triangular Christianity needs to be read more.  He has written insightful posts about the emergent church movement and also about the New Perspective on Paul.  When I need to get someone’s opinion theologically, or try and understand something, I call McLaughlin.  He occasionally answers phone calls and has great insights.  Unfortunately, he is an Ohio State Fan but sanctification is a process.

Moses and Paul to Outback Steakhouse (Blogging Editor’s Note: This is a weak choice.  I like Outback, but must we resort to chains?).  It would be fun to listen to their stories and ask some questions along the way.  I’d probably give Moses a copy of Galatians to see what he thinks.  I think the dynamics would be good, though both can get a little testy…

Andy Naselli – Thoughts on Exegetical, Biblical, Historical, Systematic, and Practical Theology – Gets the coveted “A Brick in the Valley Internet Service Award” – - which I just this minute invented – - He receives the award for having helped give us all better access to D.A. Carson’s works (here).  Besides, he understands the aorist tense, see for instance, this post on a Nooma Blooper.  Subscribe.  Learn.

Ruth’s Chris Steak House (more realistically: Chipotle) (Blogging Editor’s Note: I’ll buy for Ruth’s).

Job and Isaiah: I’m currently writing a dissertation on how Paul quotes Job and Isaiah at the end of Romans 11, and I have all sorts of questions for those two men!

Dan Phillips of Biblical Christianity and Pyromaniacs – I think there is a subtle temptation to jump on one bandwagon or another with the whole blogging thing.  Perhaps, sometimes we bloggers choose a particular current, and then swim with the stream within that current.  Our friends over at Pyromaniacs, however, have never been accused of this.  They think for themselves.  They affirm when affirmation is due.  Conversely, build a fire when they believe it is warranted.  I subscribe. 

I’d say we go to Stuart Anderson’s Black Angus. Reasonable for a pastor/author’s salary, but pleasant,secluded booths; high walls. Nice for a quiet conversation. And steaks, lamb, prime rib — yum.
It’d be interesting to ask Paul and the author of Hebrews, and see if only one chariot arrives… or, if not, whether Apollos walks or rides. But I’d say Paul, and… Solomon. If they could bring buddy dates, I’d ask for Moses and Isaiah.

Blogging Editor’s Note: IMHO there is a very, very small (infinitesimal) chance Paul wrote Hebrews.  But, I agree that Apollos is a good guess.

Shannon Popkin – Tiny Paragraphs – Shannon thinks deeply and theologically about being a wife and mother of young children.  She is also a great story teller.  She is not to be trusted anywhere near an archery range.

Charlie’s Crab, which overlooks the river, has white linen tablecloths, and great fish–hopefully John will think so, too.  I’m inviting John because he can answer more of my questions about Heaven than anybody.  (Maybe we can get some updated similes regarding what he saw.)  I’d also like to have Miriam at the table.  I imagine she is a great storyteller, and I want to hear about babysitting in the bulrushes and dancing on the receded Red Sea’s bank.  Plus, I’d like to pick her brain on family dynamics, the fear of the Lord, and women in leadership. 

Owen Strachan – Offers some thinking on issues like this post on sacrificing children to sports.  Owen keeps his finger on the pulse of a wide range of web resources. 

I’ll go with Froggy’s in Highwood as the place to eat.  I’ll take my wife.

I would love to meet Samson, because he’s got the whole tragic hero thing going on.  I think Ezekiel would be a pretty interesting guy to talk with.  He saw some strange stuff.]

Derek Thomas of Reformation 21 uses words like banjaxed.  I’ve been blessed recently listen to some of Derek’s preaching online.

Well, if you’re paying then it has to be Shapley’s (http://www.shapleys.ms). And as for guests, I would love to meet Maher-Shalalhashbaz (Isaiah’s son), partly because it would be cool to meet someone with that name and see how many people simply call him, “Baz.”.  The other person is the unnamed member of the duo that walked the Emmaus Road, partly to see if I’m correct in thinking that she is a woman since she said nothing! Now, what kind of women say nothing, I can hear you ask, but we won’t go there

Mike Wittmer is the author of Heaven is a Place on Earth and Don’t Stop Believing.  I expect his next book to be about the expansion of the Gospel in Asia with the title, China Grove.  I read his stuff.  Books. Blog.  Tragically, Wittmer is a fan of Cleveland sports franchises. 

I would eat at an Asian restaurant, preferably Indian, but last week I found that my favorite Indian restaurant in town is now a pub, so our Bible characters could go but not me.  I would invite Moses and Peter, since they had front row seats for God’s two great redemptive events and both were impulsive enough that they would probably share openly, especially if I can get a waiver to take them to the pub.

Z is for Zach Nielsen of Vitamin Z  – Has the great blogging advantage of being of Iowa descent  – Prolific.  Worthwhile links that you won’t see other places.  Z has a heart for adoption and after Russell Moore’s incredibly good book, Adopted for Life, this subject is on my mind.  Besides all that, I think I have more links to Vitamin Z in my “stupid stuff” category than any other blog. This includes my all time favorite, “Ken Lee.”  If you haven’t watched Ken Lee, please, please, please watch it.  Or, see this one which Z cites as one of the little blessings he enjoys from the Internet.

1.  I would like to eat at Scalo in Albuquerque.  The have a great jazz combo on Friday nights as well as a great wine list and delicious italian food.  

2.  Who would come along…  hmmmmmmm.  Jonah for sure.  The world’s worst evangelist.  What an interesting dude.  Belly of a fish?  That would be a wild tale.  I’m sure he wouldn’t eat seafood anymore so going to an Italian restaurant would probably be appropriate.    I would also like to invite Noah.  How in the world did everything work on that boat for 40 days and how did they get all the animals rounded up?  That would be an interesting tale as well I’m sure.

Amy Scott of Amy’s Humble Musings – I am a farm kid.  Grew up 8 miles from a town of a thousand people  Reading about the Scott family farm experience is refreshing for me, especially given her great pictures.  She is a wonderful writer and doesn’t take herself too seriously.  This post is one of my favorites.

. . . I was going to be snarky and say "the writer of Hebrews" so we could see who it was, but I see Dan beat me to it. If my husband had a vote, he says that he’d like Sarah to come and have some influence on me. He likes the part where she calls her husband, "lord." ;)

We’d eat Indian, just because that’s the best food there is.

Is There Something You Won’t Give Up?

When we cling to worthless idols, despondency and hopelessness will not be far away.

Jonah reminds us that the price of idolatry is very high.  When we hold onto something we know that we need to renounce, we lose sight of the hope we have in Christ, or forfeit the grace that could be ours.

Those who pay regard to vain idols forsake their hope of steadfast love (Jonah 2:8, ESV).

Those who cling to worthless idols forfeit the grace that could be theirs (Jonah 2:8, NIV).

If there is something you know that you need to renounce, yet you continue to cling to it, is it really worth that price?

An Interview with Danny Akin: On Apathy, Baptisms, Re-Baptisms, and Having Children

Trevin Wax continues an interview with Danny Akin, president of Southeastern Seminary.  I’m not a Southern Baptist, but, I found myself agreeing with at least three things he said.

  • Dr. Akin observes that one of the big challenges being faced currently is apathy.
  • He acknowledges that too many children have been baptized who were later re-baptized because they didn’t think they were believers in the first place.

Of course, I am not for baptizing children at a very young age. We have made a huge mistake there. So let’s just go ahead and recognize the elephant in the room: many of the baptisms we record every year are re-baptisms. People that are baptized as children come to be convinced that they had not understood the gospel, had not been converted, and therefore went through baptism again.

  • He expresses concern over declining birth rates.

You can almost document the stagnation and decline of baptisms within the Southern Baptist Convention as the decline in the number of children that Baptist have.

The truth is, (and I said this in my Axioms sermon that’s either famous or infamous depending on your perspective) we have bought into the mindset of the modern world in that we think that less children is best or at least better. Because we have less children, we have less family members coming to faith in Christ.

This one is worth thinking about carefully.

Read the whole thing here.

What’s the Matter with Matter?

Answer: nothing is the matter with matter.

If you asked me to list the most important concepts I learned in seminary, one of them would be the idea that the destination of God’s people is not to hover eternally in space in some disembodied state.  Rather, God will restore his people to a New (or a renewed) Earth: God’s Creation liberated from its bondage to decay.

Growing up, I thought eternity would be in Heaven (not the New Earth).  Heaven, I feared, would be like one of my great aunt’s homes where everything was really nice but we were forced to sit quietly while the big people talked.  Worse (and I’m talking about my sentiment as a child), I feared that it would be like church: boring

First of all, I’ve matured a bit in my desire to be with God’s people (and my views about church).  But, part of how I matured was to learn that we aren’t going to eternally flit about the clouds in white robes.  Ladd said (paraphrased), “The Bible always envisions an earthly destination for God’s people.”

If you haven’t thought much about how we’re earthlings, made for earth, and that we will spend eternity on a New Earth, you really need to read Mike Wittmer’s book, Heaven is a Place on Earth

Internet Monk recently interviewed Dr. Mike Wittmer, but click over and read the entire interview.

Many evangelicals think too little of God’s physical creation. They wrongly suppose that matter doesn’t matter or worse, that matter is the matter. This leads them to suppose that their spiritual soul is good and their physical body is bad and that a spiritual heaven is good and this physical earth is bad. So salvation becomes escapism. The goal of life is to slough off this body and troubled planet and go to heaven, where their divine-like souls can twinkle and shine forever. Of course, this is precisely what the Gnostics believed, but as I show in Heaven Is a Place on Earth, there is not one verse of Scripture which supports this view. Instead, the biblical hope, as N.T. Wright explains so well in Surprised by Hope, is the restoration of this creation.

Read it all here.

Luther on Whether or Not Being Missional is Worth the Risk?

Recently, I made a missions trip to Togo, Africa.  I went with the experienced missionaries of ABWE.  I was in good hands.  Still, it is a long way from Stillman Valley, IL to Mango.  And, I had to ask, “Is it responsible to risk going to a remote part of Africa?”

Relative to a far riskier ministry, Martin Luther once spoke to whether or not Christians should take chances ministering to those with the bubonic plague.  Though, the worst of the plague was in 1350, it was still around in Luther’s day.  On August 2, 1527, it was discovered in Wittenberg.  Near panic ensued.  The University was closed and the city evacuated.  Luther, however, stayed and busied himself with pastoral ministries and caring for the sick.

People encouraged Luther to speak to whether or not Christians should risk the plague to minister to the sick.  That November, Luther summarized his thoughts for a pastor friend in Breslau.  He did not think everyone needed to stay, but he did argue that those on whom the sick person is dependent should remain.

This I well know, that if it were Christ or his mother who were laid low by illness, everybody would be so solicitous and would gladly become a servant or helper.  Everyone would want to be bold and fearless; nobody would flee but everyone would come running . . . If you wish to serve Christ and to wait on him, very well, you have your sick neighbor close at hand.  Go to him and serve him, and you will surely find Christ in him.  (Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings, edited by Lull.  Background information also comes from Lull.

In Mango, Togo, there is scarcely any Gospel witness or medical care.  I am persuaded that believers who hear God’s call to touch Togo, will one day know that they did a lot for for the least, even for our Lord himself (Matthew 25:40).  The picture I frequently post of the little girl we call at our house, “Miss Mango,” is  the face I have in mind.  She’s worth the risk in her own right, but all the more when we remember our Lord’s words.

And the King will answer them, “Truly I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.”  (Matt 25:40).

Togolese Angel

Reading, Reflection, and Preaching

“An individual without time to read broadly and intensely, without time to reflect on life, without time to compose (even if merely in a personal journal), is not likely to be an individual who can preach.”  T. David Gordon.

 

T. David Gordon on Watching Television (I Think He’s Against It)

I read today to great profit Gordon’s recent book on preaching or the lack thereof.  I would recommend it for pastors.  (Gordon will make you feel a bit defensive at points which is a good thing).  I would also recommend this book for pastoral search committees.

In a footnote Gordon had this bit on watching television.  I’m guessing he is not a real big fan.  In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if he buys televisions just so he can smash them.

Television-watching prohibits [the discernment needed to distinguish the significant from the insignificant]. One simply cannot regard the significant as more important than the insignificant, and then plop himself in front of a television for two to three hours an evening. The only way the conscience can survive such a colossal waste of a human life is for the individual to refuse to entertain the question of the difference between the significant and the insignificant.

He’s right, of course. But, it’s okay to watch 24.  I absolve you.  But, nothing else but 24 and Jack is underground for the summer.  Turn the television off.  Read something.

Ever the Tactful One, Luther Explains to Erasmus Why The Delay In Writing The Bondage of the Will

I suspect that many people who would call themselves “Reformed” in their theology, have never actually read much that Luther wrote.  If you want to get started, The Bondage of the Will, would be a good place to begin.

At least read the brief excerpt below.  Keep in mind that Erasmus was one of the most respected theologians of the day.  Indeed, Luther addresses him as the “venerable.”  But, things quickly heat up from there.

Luther’s basic point here is that Erasmus’ previous work was so weak that Luther “greatly felt for him,” or as another translations says, “your book struck me as so cheap and paltry that I felt profoundly sorry for you.”

Martin Luther, to the venerable D. Erasmus of Rotterdam, wishing Grace and Peace in Christ.

THAT I have been so long answering your DIATRIBE on FREE-WILL, venerable Erasmus, has happened contrary to the expectation of all, and contrary to my own custom also. For hitherto, I have not only appeared to embrace willingly opportunities of this kind for writing, but even to seek them of my own accord. Some one may, perhaps, wonder at this new and unusual thing, this forbearance or fear, in Luther, who could not be roused up by so many boasting taunts, and letters of adversaries, congratulating Erasmus on his victory and singing to him the song of Triumph – What that Maccabee, that obstinate assertor, then, has at last found an Antagonist a match for him, against whom he dares not open his mouth!

But so far from accusing them, I myself openly concede that to you, which I never did to any one before:- that you not only by far surpass me in the powers of eloquence, and in genius, (which we all concede to you as your desert, and the more so, as I am but a barbarian and do all things barbarously,) but that you have damped my spirit and impetus, and rendered me languid before the battle; and that by two means. First, by art: because, that is, you conduct this discussion with a most specious and uniform modesty; by which you have met and prevented me from being incensed against you. And next, because, on so great a subject, you say nothing but what has been said before: therefore, you say less about, and attribute more unto "Free-will," than the Sophists have hitherto said and attributed: (of which I shall speak more fully hereafter.) So that it seems even superfluous to reply to these your arguments, which have been indeed often refuted by me; but trodden down, and trampled under foot, by the incontrovertible Book of Philip Melanchthon "Concerning Theological Questions:" a book, in my judgment, worthy not only of being immortalized, but of being included in the ecclesiastical canon: in comparison of which, your Book is, in my estimation, so mean and vile, that I greatly feel for you for having defiled your most beautiful and ingenious language with such vile trash; and I feel an indignation against the matter also, that such unworthy stuff should be borne about in ornaments of eloquence so rare; which is as if rubbish, or dung, should he carried in vessels of gold and silver. And this you yourself seem to have felt, who were so unwilling to undertake this work of writing; because your conscience told you, that you would of necessity have to try the point with all the powers of eloquence; and that, after all, you would not be able so to blind me by your colouring, but that I should, having torn off the deceptions of language, discover the real dregs beneath. For, although I am rude in speech, yet, by the grace of God, I am not rude in understanding. And, with Paul, I dare arrogate to myself understanding and with confidence derogate it from you; although I willingly, and deservedly, arrogate eloquence and genius to you, and derogate it from myself.

Wherefore, I thought thus – If there be any who have not drank more deeply into, and more firmly held my doctrines, which are supported by such weighty Scriptures, than to be moved by these light and trivial arguments of Erasmus, though so highly ornamented, they are not worthy of being healed by my answer. Because, for such men, nothing could be spoken or written of enough, even though it should be in many thousands of volumes a thousands times repeated: for it is as if one should plough the seashore, and sow seed in the sand, or attempt to fill a cask, full of holes, with water. For, as to those who have drank into the teaching of the Spirit in my books, to them, enough and an abundance has been administered, and they at once contemn your writings. But, as to those who read without the Spirit, it is no wonder if they be driven to and fro, like a reed, with every wind. To such, God would not have said enough, even if all his creatures should be converted into tongues. Therefore it would, perhaps, have been wisdom, to have left these offended at your book, along with those who glory in you and decree to you the triumph.

Hence, it was not from a multitude of engagements, nor from the difficulty of the undertaking, nor from the greatness of your eloquence, nor from a fear of yourself; but from mere irksomeness, indignation, and contempt, or (so to speak) from my judgment of your Diatribe, that my impetus to answer you was damped. Not to observe, in the mean time, that, being ever like yourself, you take the most diligent care to be on every occasion slippery and pliant of speech; and while you wish to appear to assert nothing, and yet, at the same time, to assert something, more cautious than Ulysses, you seem to be steering your course between Scylla and Charybdis. To meet men of such a sort, what, I would ask, can be brought forward or composed, unless any one knew how to catch Proteus himself? But what I may be able to do in this matter, and what profit your art will be to you, I will, Christ cooperating with me, hereafter shew.

Read more here.

For an excellent sample of Luther’s theological writings, see the below: