Monthly Archive for August, 2009

Page 2 of 6

Mike Wittmer on the Prayer of Jabez

It’s probably been a while since you thought about Bruce Wilkinson and his hot selling book, The Prayer of Jabez.  But, given the reception it received in evangelicalism, its reception tells us something about ourselves worth considering.  And, I don’t mean that to sound overly cynical.  One way or another, it struck a chord.

Mike Wittmer’s reflection on The Prayer of Jabez is worth reading:

My present study of evangelical fideism led me yesterday to revisit the gift book that rocked our pre-9/11 world, the “little prayer with the giant prize” (17), The Prayer of Jabez.

. . . All to say I appreciate and highly respect the source of Bruce Wilkinson’s booklet, but I have some questions about his execution.

As far as I can tell, here is Wilkinson’s argument:

1. We should ask God for more.

I basically agree with this, though I think Wilkinson possesses an American preoccupation with size (e.g., p. 57—would having less than 100 kids at VBS be a failure?) and a too low view of providence. He is not content with having God work through normal channels, but argues that men and women of faith should be experiencing miracles on a daily basis, (p. 16, 24, 33), which he helpfully defines down as “an intervention by God to make something happen that wouldn’t normally happen” (p. 43). . . .

Read the whole thing here.

The Bible is a Missionary Book

Dr. Paul Beals:

The Pauline model for missions does not stand alone on the horizon like a silo raising out of an Iowa prairie.  It is an integral part of the biblical panorama in which the triune God reveals Himself as missionary God.  He pleads “Come” in the Old Testament.  He commands “Go” in the New Testament . . .

The Bible is a missionary book.  Scripture in its entirety declares God’s purpose of making His person and work known throughout humankind by His people – - Israel in the Old Testament and the church in the New. (A People for His Name, 23).

Iowa farm kids like me appreciate the imagery of the opening line.  But, far more than that, I am thankful that I had a professor like Dr. Beals who taught me that the whole Bible is a missionary book.

“Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end”

Know this song?

Either way, you hopefully know the text:

Ecclesiastes 3:1-15

" For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven:

a time to be born, and a time to die;

a time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted;

a time to kill, and a time to heal;

a time to break down, and a time to build up;

a time to weep, and a time to laugh;

a time to mourn, and a time to dance;

a time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together;

a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;

a time to seek, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away;

a time to tear, and a time to sew;

a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;

a time to love, and a time to hate;

a time for war, and a time for peace.

What gain has the worker from his toil? I have seen the business that God has given to the children of man to be busy with. He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end. I perceived that there is nothing better for them than to be joyful and to do good as long as they live; also that everyone should eat and drink and take pleasure in all his toil—this is God’s gift to man. I perceived that whatever God does endures forever; nothing can be added to it, nor anything taken from it. God has done it, so that people fear before him. That which is, already has been; that which is to be, already has been; and God seeks what has been driven away."

Ed Welch has written a helpful article focusing on the meaning of Eccl 3:11 (which is in bold):

But, given this article, maybe just the opposite is true. Those early events, and a number of them since, demonstrate that I am completely incapable of grasping the eternal. Perhaps the ability to be intrigued by the eternal is in my heart, but I certainly don’t have the ability to comprehend it.

Gault isn’t motivated by our odd infatuation with infinity so much as he is interested in a passage that is more complex than we think. Apparently there are no less than ten popular interpretations of the word eternity in this passage. The most common is found in Richardson’s book, where it means “a sense of eternity,” “a longing for eternity,” or “a quest for eternal matters.” This translation would be settled except Ecclesiastes isn’t interested in life after death. Its basic theology is “all come from dust, and to dust all return” (3:20). Its main interest is present life “under the sun” and not our musings about eternity.

The translation Gault prefers is darkness or ignorance rather than eternity, and he is not alone in his choice. To get this he must change the vowels of the Hebrew word, which is permissible because the original text was written only in consonants with vowels being added centuries after the text was completed.

Here is the entire verse (NIV):

He has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end.

A paraphrase reflecting Gault’s preferred translation might read like this:

God has made everything appropriate in its time. He has placed darkness in the human heart so that people cannot discover all God has done. (Gault p.53)

This gives a very different conclusion. In times of difficulty, we are tempted to ask, “What is God doing?” or even “How could He have allowed this to happen?” The revised text offers this answer.

While God has created all the “times” of life (Ecclesiastes 3:2-8), each appropriate in its time (v.10), He has obscured humanity’s knowledge, placing darkness in their hearts, so that they cannot discover His divine program (v.11). But why? Because God wants humanity to enjoy the work He has given them (vv.12-13), to trust in His sovereignty and fear Him (v.14). (Gault p.57)

Focus on your task at hand; trust God for the future. That would be the message of the verse, and it fits the message of the larger book. It is simple and wise advice.

Read the whole thing here.

HT: Challies

A Turn Around Church?

This sermon excerpt may make you mad.  But, there is a point.  You need to read the whole thing – no skipping ahead.

***********

Once there was a church that was dry and dusty, frustrated and confused.  It smelled like moth balls.  It hadn’t always been like that.  There had been a day.  The Holy Spirit had blown powerfully and God’s work had been visible and dramatic.  One leader in the church, Zeke Hanson, often related how his marriage was on the rocks when he understood the good news about Christ.  His wife sobbed with joy when he was baptized and the turn around in his home had been immediate and astonishing.   George Simmons had been saved out of a life of alcoholism.  Peg and Keith Jones had always been solid citizens but one day they had been gripped by their sin and turned in faith to Christ.  Doris Simmons became a missionary and was now in Papa New Guinea.

But, that was a long time ago and the church was tired.  The nursery sign-up sheet was rarely filled out.  You could have found more volunteering at a military base.  Prayer meeting amounted to another sermon from the pastor and a summary of who was sick.  Serving meant getting the weeds pulled, the bathrooms cleaned, the bulletins printed, and the people called on who didn’t come.  Nobody could remember a conversion.

It was a sticky month of June that got things going again. The pastor was sure that one reason the church didn’t get more visitors was because everybody in town knew that the Nazarenes were the only ones with air conditioning.  So, the elders brought a motion at a special business meeting to spend the Bob Peterson memorial fund on a new Carrier air conditioner.  Gene Johnson pointed out that in the Midwest that point was relevant only nine months of the year (Gene didn’t even use the air conditioning in his car). Bob Peterson’s brother Fred indicated that his brother wasn’t in favor of air conditioning and thought it would be disrespectful to spend the money in that way.  A young father spoke in favor of air conditioning.  Burt Speck thought maybe they should just get window units.  Voices were raised, people spoke up who hadn’t talked in years.  The pro-air condition people nodded with concern when one of their advocates sermonized.  The con-air conditioner people murmured approval on behalf of their champions.  It was quite a discussion.

Mrs. Holmes, an older lady who had been a widow for many years, finally brought direction to a discussion pulled in many directions.  She quietly explained that she thought the frustration really wasn’t about air conditioners.  “The problem is,” she shared, “that we just haven’t seen God work for a long time.  If  the leaders would take us forward, we would all get behind them.  As for the air conditioner, let’s just go ahead and get the thing.  But, I don’t think it is really going to solve our problems.”

After that, the air conditioner was taken care of in short order (though it was decided not to take it out of the Bob Peterson memorial).  But, rather than dismissing, the pastor made some comments.  He indicated that he thought Mrs. Holmes was right and pledged that in the coming days the elders would do their best to identify a direction to move forward.  “I guess the question for you is this,” he concluded, “If we identify a direction, will you support it?”  Everyone nodded they would.

That was June.  Within the week the elders were holding meetings in homes and the fellowship hall to get input from the people.  Within the month they had outlined a plan.  By September, they were ready to go.  At a special business meeting, the plan was approved with a loud “yes”.  Now that the waiting was over and they had a direction, the people proved that they could move forward.  Fred Peterson suggested that they spend his brother’s memorial on new equipment for the children.  Raymond Carter announced a large sacrificial gift to install a new Bose sound system..  The worship leader started experimenting with the order of service, attendance increased, and in the course of one sermon people said “amen” in three different place.  It had been years since they had seen such enthusiasm. By Christmas you wouldn’t have know it was the same church.  Attendance was up.  Ten people had been saved including the high school principal.  The pastor had been asked to give a seminar on how to turn around a church at the National Convention for Pastors and he in turn involved the elders.  Now they all had their picture in a color brochure displayed proudly on the bulletin board.  The dry and dusty church was shiny and new.  There was even talk of entering a church float in the Memorial Day parade for the first time in years.  They were unified and moving forward.

******************

Now let me read you this story from a more ancient source.  Turn in your Bibles to Exodus 32:1-6.

Exodus 32:1-6 When the people saw that Moses was so long in coming down from the mountain, they gathered around Aaron and said, “Come, make us gods who will go before us. As for this fellow Moses who brought us up out of Egypt, we don’t know what has happened to him.”  2 Aaron answered them, “Take off the gold earrings that your wives, your sons and your daughters are wearing, and bring them to me.” 3 So all the people took off their earrings and brought them to Aaron. 4 He took what they handed him and made it into an idol cast in the shape of a calf, fashioning it with a tool. Then they said, “These are your gods, O Israel, who brought you up out of Egypt.” 5 When Aaron saw this, he built an altar in front of the calf and announced, “Tomorrow there will be a festival to the LORD.” 6 So the next day the people rose early and sacrificed burnt offerings and presented fellowship offerings. Afterward they sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in revelry.

You say, “Well, okay, what is the point of all this?”

Familiarity with Old Testament accounts sometimes makes Pharisees out of us.  We say, “Oh those wicked Israelites.”  But, I think when we think of the story in the more contemporary terms we understand the Israelites a little better.

Think about the parallels between the first account I read and the incident of the Golden Calf.  The nation of Israel had seen God dramatically at work in their midst.

(1)    They smelled the Nile when it was turned into blood 
(2)    They heard the cries of Egyptian mothers after their firstborn were killed in the Passover 
(3)    They felt the spray of the ocean when the Red Sea was parted, 
(4)    They saw one of the world’s most powerful leaders, pharaoh, forced to his knees.

But, even with that history time goes by very quickly.  Here they were at the base of the mountain and no one knew what had become of Moses.  They were tired of waiting.  Notice the first couple of verses .

Exodus 32:1-2 When the people saw that Moses was so long in coming down from the mountain, they gathered around Aaron and said, “Come, make us gods who will go before us. As for this fellow Moses who brought us up out of Egypt, we don’t know what has happened to him.”

It was because they were tired of waiting and tired of not moving forward that they became impatient.  Following Yahweh was one thing when he turned the Nile into blood or parted the Red Seas.  It was quite another when it meant slugging it out day after day at the foot of a mountain.

So the leaders came up with a plan.  They wanted to invent new methods for worshiping the God who had dramatically delivered them. Their articulated intentions on the face of them weren’t entirely bad. They wanted to worship the gods who delivered them out of Egypt.  Now, you can say that they should have talked about gods singular.  But, still they were pointing to the God who delivered them.

In short order they experienced astonishing unity and moved ahead.  Now, think of the cooperation, skill, and sacrifice required to make this thing happen.  Many of them would have had to give up gold to make this happen.  It was a very successful capitol campaign.  They achieved the “hallelujah goal.”

They involved craftsmen and people with a vision for art.  I am sure that they were amazed that anything as beautiful as the golden calf could be manufactured.  Some of the gods in Israel had been cattle and now they were using those images to worship their God.  They were proud of themselves.

This was their attempt to worship the gods who delivered them out of Egypt.

They saw results and were pleased.  6 So the next day the people rose early and sacrificed burnt offerings and presented fellowship offerings. Afterward they sat down to eat and drink and got up to indulge in revelry.

They move forward in a unified way and are seeing visible results.

You see the parallels to our fictional story.  (By the way, the story was fictional.  What I did was outline the major points of the account from Exodus 32 and make it into the story.  I was not intending to represent our church).

But notice the parallels: People could remember God working dramatically.  Israel remembered deliverance from Egypt. These people remember their conversions.

After a time they become impatient.  Israel was tired of Moses being on the mountain.   The people in our story were tired of waiting for God to work in their community.  They wanted to see God work powerfully in their midst.

We feature such impatience all the time.  “You don’t know how long I have put up with my marriage.”  “You don’t know how long I have worked in the nursery.  I have put my time in and now it must be someone else’s turn or there must be a better way.”

So, the people and the leaders get together and they come up with a plan.  They moved forward in a unified way. 

And, from all appearances it is good movement.  The church even got some recognition.  And, since I didn’t give the details of their plan, it may have been okay.  That is where our story parts with the Exodus account.  But, what you need to see is that moving forward in a unified way, seeing results, isn’t enough.  We must have God’s kind of forward movement.

I spent time thinking about whether or not to use the opening illustration.  I a friend to listen to it, and we talked about it, and dialogued about whether or not it is a good idea.  One of my fears was that it has a bit of a cynical edge on it.  But, as I reflected on it, I realized that is exactly the point.  Sometimes through impatience and frustration, a church gets a bit cynical.  And, then out of a spirit of cynicism they establish unity, and forge direction.   Listen, while I obviously think it is okay to use humor at times to make a point, I want you to know that I couldn’t be more serious about Jesus Christ and this church.

Here is the point.  It is possible for a church to be unified and seeing results and not be pleasing to God.  Not to say that moving forward is wrong or, of course, that unity is wrong.  Rather, we have to come to God on His terms, not ours.

The whole book of Exodus is teaching that very lesson.  Israel’s covenant relationship with God was to be founded on the terms dictated by God, not simply the idols that the Israelites contrived.

In doing church this doesn’t mean that we are supposed to be passive and keep everything the same and play it safe.  From Genesis to Revelation Scripture teaches that following Christ is a pilgrimage of risk.  Jesus has harsh words for people who play it safe.  He sent us out into the world to make disciples.  But, the point is, we don’t come to God on our own terms.  We come on his.  And, we aren’t supposed to simply look for visible results but to ask ourselves if we are engaged in the activity God would have us to be engaged.

There is such a thing working hard to serve the Lord and ending up worshipping a golden calf.

Words of Constructive Criticism in the Ongoing Conversation About Unpacking Forgiveness

The chance to write a book is not an opportunity to give a definitive and final word.  Only one book is a definitive and final word.  For those who are “always reforming” / semper reformanda, being an author is an opportunity to enter into a great conversation.  In writing, Unpacking Forgiveness, I was given a seat at the table and the chance to make carefully measured statements about a topic that is central in life.  It is a joy.

What is a particular blessing with the advent of blogs is that the “table” of those talking and listening is suddenly much larger.  Ten years ago, a book like mine would have received only modest interaction.  But, now I hear from people around the world.

In the last week, I have heard from two different people sources about Unpacking Forgiveness.  In different ways, they both made suggestions for how UF might be improved.  One person wrote a thoughtful email about the relationship between reconciliation and forgiveness. 

I read a review today from a blog that I think is an excellent contribution to the forgiveness conversation.  And, that isn’t because it’s all “blue sky.”  In fact, the reviewer makes this point:

Speaking of pain, Brauns is not afraid to bring in examples that are harrowing to read.  The nature of the illustrations serves the points that are being made, not least by driving home the gulf that a forgiving spirit is ready and willing to cross.  At the same time, certain examples are unpleasant, and some might feel that their use constitutes overkill.  The same point could be made with less extreme examples, and perhaps with a little less detail.  There is a danger of inviting readers to indulge in “forgiveness voyeurism” where the grossness of the sins forgiven becomes more interesting than the matter of forgiveness itself.

Click here to read the whole thing.

If you click through to the review, you can see the feedback I gave.  The bottom line is, he might be right.  One of the most difficult aspects of preaching and teaching is drawing the line about how to illustrate points.  When I wrote, Unpacking Forgiveness, I was determined to not write a book that deal with the superficial sleights that so many get upset about.  But, I may have leaned to far in the direction of talking about the really deep wounds people receive.

What do you think?  It’s your chance to sit down at the table and talk forgiveness.

You can find the link to more reviews of Unpacking Forgiveness here

Start the Week With the Greatest Television Character of All Time

An Illustration of Why We Should Be Patient And Cautious About A Child’s Profession of Faith

Shannon Popkin:

Me:  "Why did Jesus die?"

Cade: "To save us from our sins."

Me:  "Have you sinned?"

Cade:  "Yea, like when I scratched Cole last night."

Me:  "What is God’s punishment for sin?"

Cade:  "He says we have to die.  Like, in hell."

Me:  "How can you be saved from your sin?"

Cade:  "Believe in the Lord Jesus and you will be saved.  Hey, Mommy.  You know what would be really great?  Like, you know what would be really, really cool??

Me:  "What?"

Cade:  "If we could have, like a million billion boxes of macaroni and cheese in our cupboard!  Wouldn’t that be awesome??"

I have friends who would argue that Cade is saved.  And this conversation does give evidence of faith and belief . . .

Read the whole thing here.

Preachers Need to Have Moral Courage

If you have four minutes, listen to Haddon Robinson share how pastors can have moral courage when preaching.  Click here.

Again, it’s only four minutes long.

B.B. Warfield on the Trinity in the Old Testament

Warfield:

The Old Testament may be likened to a chamber richly furnished but dimly lighted: the introduction of light brings into it nothing which was not in it before; but it brings out into clearer view much of what is in it but was only dimly or not at all perceived before.  The mystery of the Trinity is not revealed in the Old Testament; but the mystery of the Trinity underlies the Old Testament revelation, and here and there almost comes into view.  Thus the Old Testament revelation of God is not corrected by the fuller revelation which follows it, but is only perfected, extended and enlarged.

Quoted by Sinclair Ferguson, The Holy Spirit, 29.

With characteristic brevity, “22 Words” is unpacking forgiveness

Abraham Piper has raised a forgiveness question.  (See here).

You should weigh in with your opinion.

You won’t be surprised to notice that I split hairs in my comment.