N.D. Wilson explains: “The Hunger Games is Flawed to Its Core”

If you click to through the link, the last two paragraphs are especially important:

Nate (N. D.) Wilson is one of my favorite writers. He has given us some excellent fiction and non-fiction books. He knows what makes a story work.

Nate was in town recently, and we had a conversation about books, beauty, and bestsellers. Naturally, we talked about The Hunger Games. His take on it was too good to keep to myself, so I asked if I could share it here.

Why Hunger Games is Flawed to Its Core
N.D. Wilson

Almost everywhere I go, I’m asked about The Hunger Games (book, not film). The questions used to fly about Twilight and Potter, but Katniss and dystopic death-matches have taken over.

First, I completely understand why The Hunger Games took off. Suzanne Collins knows how to suck readers into a page-turning frenzy. The pace of the book grabs like gorilla glue and the kill-or-be-killed tension keeps fingernails nibbled short. She knows her craft, and I have to say that I’m grateful to her for expanding our mutual marketplace (in the same way that Rowling did). That said, Collins stumbles badly .  .  .

Read the rest here.

 

2 thoughts on “N.D. Wilson explains: “The Hunger Games is Flawed to Its Core”

  1. This was a terrible review. Trevin usually gets one or two comments per post. He got 109 or more on this post and 99% of them were negative. Sorry. Just sayin’

  2. I approved your comment. But you really need to say something substantive if you want anyone to take your assessment seriously.

Comments are closed.